Artificial intelligence in the legal field

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to analyze artificial intelligence before human reasoning to establish its contribution  to  legal field, paying particular attention to a possibility that computers or machines could replace  tasks performed by  human beings, when dispensing justice in an objective and effective way  using tools not related  to human reasoning.  METHOD: deductive, scientific and analytical, based on the development of the theoretical framework which started from  general to  particular, knowing various elements of the phenomenon to be studied in order to understand it.  RESULTS: artificial intelligence is a futuristic modality that aims to simplify judicial processes by applying the principle of celerity, and establishing that it is far from being able to substitute human reasoning.  CONCLUSION: the function that computers or machines perform through programmed knowledge, does not allow to have an effective solution of cases, considering that it is very far from replacing human reasoning or judgement, since there are methods and ways of evaluating  means of proof or evidence that cannot be replaced through artificial intelligence, and that is why it is established that artificial intelligence is very far from reality as well as difficult to substitute  human beings  within the legal field.